Aika silmiä avaava kirjoitus:
On The Revelations of Pandemic Data
rwmalonemd.substack.com
Koronatilastoinnista:
"
There was a genuine excess death peak in February and March of 2020, when COVID first arrived. We're now finding out that was actually due to very poor medical decisions made in respect to the elderly. And I'm not just talking about giving the wrong treatments, such as inappropriately putting patients on ventilators. My clinical colleagues now realize that moving hospitalized elderly patients into care homes where COVID spread like wildfire was catastrophic.
The subsequent increase in deaths from the novel COVID virus were likely connected to mismanagement and lack of appropriate treatment."
"So there was an initial increase, which can be accounted for by a new powerful variant of the flu that was mismanaged."
Pfizerin rokotetutkimuksista:
"Not just in Argentina, but in many of the big observational trials conducted after the vaccine rollout, anyone who was vaccinated and who got COVID within two weeks, was classified as an unvaccinated person. The biased rationale behind this decision was that it takes at least two weeks for the vaccine to take effect.
This misclassification became accepted as a worldwide practice that distorted the data everywhere."
"The Pfizer trial wouldn't have reached the target without the Argentine site, where there had been mass recruitment just before the deadline. There's circumstantial evidence that it was set up to obtain the 95% effectiveness figure."
Rokotteiden tehosta:
"
Now we are finding out that it's the people who received the vaccine multiple times who are getting COVID more than once, rather than the unvaccinated.
We've got the numbers showing that in each age group; the vaccinated are disproportionately more likely to get COVID than the unvaccinated."
"
Australia, for example, currently has the highest COVID mortality rate in the world and claims 96% are vaccinated. There are variables, but there is certainly no correlation showing that vaccinated populations have a lower chance of dying from COVID."
Ylikuolleisuudesta:
"
Forum: Your group was one of the first to look at all cause mortality and you recognized some interesting anomalies.
Fenton: Yes, if you want to really understand the safety of the vaccines, you need to
analyze all-cause mortality. When we first looked at the ONS data for the UK vaccine program we saw a very strange correlation.
Incredibly, according to the ONS data, as the vaccines were released, there was a significant increase in deaths from other causes than COVID among the unvaccinated. These two statistics should be unrelated.
The most likely explanationfor this anomaly was that many of those who were dying shortly after vaccination were being classified as unvaccinated. Once the data are adjusted for this misclassification there is no evidence that the vaccines reduce all-cause mortality; rather, there is evidence it may cause an increase, especially in the younger age groups. This should have caused great concern and immediate intervention."
"For the people with reactions and for those who died, it’s not insignificant. The most important questions concerning risk versus benefit haven’t been addressed, and any data questioning vaccine dangers have been successfully repressed. What we do know from some of the numbers is that there is a verifiable risk and questionable benefit."
www.is.fi
www.uusisuomi.fi
