Archey
Banned
- Liittynyt
- 24.7.2005
- Viestejä
- 2 985
- Ikä
- 62
Älä sotke minua noihin lihakset rentoina tai ei aktivoidu juttuhin.
Vedän itse vielä liioitellummin kuin Peter, mutta en ole aikaisemmin mavessa tai polvilta vedosssa vetänyt epäkkäitä koko pituudeltaan yhteen, ei normi vedoissa ole siihen mitään tarvetta ja se tekee vedoista huomattavasti raskaampia. Yleensä karrikoiden riittää pelkkä ruodon suoristus.
Tuossa alla on yksi syy miksi, mainitsemasi "supersecret bodariversio" toimii tehokaammin ja niin tekee myös jo pelkkä rakiltaveto kuin lattiasta asti vedetty
What Are Mean And Peak Activation?
For each exercise I tested, I received data that showed both the mean activation and the peak activation.
Researchers typically use mean MVC for their data. I used to think that mean activation was more important as it measured the average activation throughout the entire repetition. However, muscles are not always active throughout the entire range of motion of an exercise, especially during compound lifts.
For example, one muscle might be very active down low in the stretched position, while another muscle becomes more active up top in the contracted position of the same exercise.
For this reason I believe that peak MVC is a more important figure. Peak activation is a measurement of the highest point of activation during the repetition.
Still, I believe that mean activation might be more important for bodybuilding purposes in providing constant tension, occlusion, and "the pump," while peak activation might be more important for sport-specific purposes in providing maximum tension at a certain moment for peak force production.
