Mitas tasta ajattelette?
Artikkeli liberalismista ja siita miten siita muokataan uutta maailmanuskontoa johon otetaan vaikutteita kaikista uskonnoista, mutta tietenkin vain liberaalin silmiin positiivisia asioita.
Ja kun suurimmalla osalla maailman ihmisista on sama uskonto niin ei tarvi enaan sotia ja riidella
Jo nykyaan moni joka ei usko jumalaan uskoo silti esim. karmaan, missa ei ole mielestani mitaan jarkea koska jos ei usko jumalaan niin melko varmasti uskoo evoluutio teoriaan mika on jyrkasti kaikkea yliluonnollista vastaan.
Mutta jos jonkinlainen henkinen taso esitetaan seuraavana evoluution askeleena sell out tiedemiesten avulla niin jopa dragon ja hanen groupiensa saattavat uskoa etta miljoonien ja miljoonien vuosien aikana planeetallemme itsestaan kehittyi henkinen taso.
Uusi "uskonto" sisaltaa myos jonkinlaista luonnon kanssa tasapainossa elamista. (mieti avatar elokuvaa ja kuinka monta jasenta on facebookeissa yms yhteisoissa nimelta "haluan muuttaa avatarplaneetalle"
ja kuinka monella heista on liberaalit aatteet?
Ei tietenkaan niin aaripaahan vietya mutta kumminkin jollain tavalla vei eteenpain tata ollaa-green-ja-yhdessa-pelastetaan-planeettamme-paskaa, Sita samaa soopaa mita al gore ja muut ilmastonlampeamishihhulit paasaa.
(Jokainen joka edes vahan kyseenalaistaa heidan juttunsa tietaa etta ilmastonlampeaminen ei ole totta)
Toisinsanoen "palvottaisiin" planeetta maata, (kuten noidat jotka sen lisaksi palvovat sarvijumalaa eli saatanaa).
Kuulosta uskomattomalta mutta itse tunnen montakin ihmista jotka varmasti olisivat aivan mehuissaan tollasesta.
Samat tyypit jotka on innoissaan obamasta ja sanoo et homous on jees ja be green
Mielenkiintoista tasta tekee sen etta jos tama koko juttu onnistuisi ja saavutettaisiin maailmanrauha ja luonnon tasapaino taman avulla niin lopulta tama menestys tarina johtaisi siihen, etta sanottaisiin etta meilla on todisteita etta tama uskonto toimii ja etta muut uskonnot kiellettaisiin ja kristityilla tulisi naina aikoina olemaan todella vaikeaa... (jossain vanhassa kirjassa muistaakseni sanottiin etta nain tulee kaymaan viimeisina paivina)
Anteeksi jos teksti on vahan epaselvaa en ole kovin artikuloivalla tuulella.
Mutta aina valitetaan ku laitan vaan linkkeja niin piti nyt nayttaa etta nain edes vahan vaivaa :P
Tassa viela kyseinen teksti:
One world religion
T he day will dawn - probably much sooner than you would ever believe - when you will no longer be allowed to hold your own religious beliefs. Your religion will be state-approved, that is, it will be the official state religion. Beyond that, religious beliefs will not be tolerated.
Sounds crazy?? No, it's not as crazy as you may think! Even now - YES, RIGHT NOW - plans are being drawn up for a future world religion. This is happening, of course, mostly out of the public spotlight. When I first heard this suggestion (around five years ago), I utterly rejected it since I have never supported conspiracy theories, but now the evidence is very strong and although my Christian writing style has never been of an apocalyptic type (and it won't change now), I feel that I must warn people.
For some while the belief has been pervasive among certain religion-rejecting academic liberals that one official world religion will lead to world-wide harmony. This obviously highly flawed and actually rather silly belief holds that the eventual disallowance of most of the present religions would help facilitate a universal acceptance of whatever policies a future world government might decide to impose. Once the format of the new world religion is decided, the plan will be to eradicate all other religions, especially fundamentalist ones, within a certain space of time, perhaps 15-30 years, perhaps a little longer. People like former British prime minister Tony Blair and arch "global warming" propagandist and conspirator Maurice Strong are said to be highly enthusiastic about the progress which has already been made in mostly 'out of the public spotlight' moves. I have been stating for some time that eventually, evangelical, Bible-consulting Christian believers will be subject to arrest in countries like the United States and the UK. Yet I have never supported conspiracy theories - it's just that the evidence is growing and things can't continue to just be ignored. For any who might scoff, I will just point out that here in the UK, even during the last 2-3 years, the government has been active in promoting anti-Christian legislation, of course they call it "legislation which is tolerant of freedom of choice and modern lifestyles." That is the gloss, but it is just anti-Christian. For example, we are now very, very close to the point where to make comments which are critical of the homosexual lifestyle, could lead to one's arrest by the police (Christians have already been arrested when attending pro-gay rallies when their only 'aggression' was to be friendly while handing out Christian leaflets).
The coming world religion will never challenge the state since it will be state-controlled. It will be liberal in general approach; it will be 'people-friendly' and assume (of course) that no God actually exists and that religion is only about people feeling good about themselves, about being happy, contented, keen to tap into one's "inner spiritual resources" and eager to cooperate with the authorities. Without question, people will be encouraged to 'look within' for their true spirituality and will probably be taught that Christianity has erred in encouraging people to serve and obey a transcendent God who is 'out there somewhere.' We may recall that Korah, the rebel who challenged Moses, believed that the people of Israel were holy within themselves, having little need of a Moses who spent time contacting an omnipotent and transcendent God who dwelt out there somewhere beyond the ordinary lives of people.
The general belief seems to be that the new religion will have three sections or arms, the first based on Catholicism, but with a strong 'New Age' mystic tinge, the second based on Islam and with an Eastern section containing many elements of Hinduism, Buddhism, Sikhism and eastern mysticism. The first 'arm,' I understand, will have no pope. Rightly or wrongly, I have been informed that, with the current hard-line pope, efforts are already well underway for liberal 'Catholic' activists to create and encourage disatisfaction and disaffection within liberal Catholicism as a first step towards an alternative, non-papal Catholicism. The belief is that a hard-line and conservative pope, such as Pope Benedict, can only help liberal Catholicism to grow.
The concept that only a state-sanctioned religion should be allowed for the individual is hardly new - it has been done before. The Jesuits practiced this in much of their south American missionary work, the medieval Catholic Church practiced it in much of Europe, but possibly the most outstanding blueprint was the European Communist Eastern bloc; this was officially atheist but, of course, there was indeed a state-sanctioned religion, that of communism! The individual was expected to slavishly worship and serve the communist ideal and state. Nobody can deny that the populace were taught to revere Marx, Lenin and Stalin with edifices and monuments to their "achievements" to be seen everywhere and pilgrimages encouraged to important places in red history.
For many years the communist bloc upheld the Orwellian concept of a "thought police," and neighbours reported on their neighbours, cousins reported on cousins and, with promises of rewards, even children sent in reports about their own parent's "uncommunist activities." One might say that this is plainly a failed model since Christianity is again strong in Russia and communism is in big decline but many world religion theorists are steeped in Marxist social theory and do not necessarily reject everything in the Soviet model. Russia and China remain - even now - the two major surveillance states (that is, states which are most keen on watching their own people), disturbingly, the UK, with CCTV cameras plastered across it's towns and cities, is now considered to be in third place!
In his article, Avatar and the Coming One World Religion, (which is here:
http://goodfight.org/a_v_avatar_one_world_religion.html), Joe Schimmel successfully points out the relationship between the new blockbuster movie Avatar and the push toward a new world religion. The movie comes, of course, from avowed anti-Christian propagandist James Cameron who currently enjoys enormous influence in Hollywood. Such movies which attack Christianity have become amazingly frequent during the last few years. Apart from 'Kingdom of Heaven,' which suggested that Christians have been the real 'bad boys' of history and muslims have been the 'good guys,' wrongly persecuted by Christianity, there have been several lower profile attacks on Christianity, such as in the 2000 movie, 'Chocolat.' Attacking Christianity is an undeniable Hollywood trend.
Al Gore
Among other influential voices who have been pushing for a new world religion is none other than influential 'climate change' propagandist Al Gore. Gore, whose 'An Inconvenient Truth' global warming video, was slammed in the British High Court because of it's incredible errors, has long believed that a new world religion is required, as witnessed by his 1992 book, Earth in the Balance. He wants a religion rooted in 'Mother Earth' New Age concepts:
“This pan religious perspective may prove especially important where our global civilization's responsibility for the earth is concerned…Native American religions, for instance, offer a rich tapestry of ideas about our relationship to the earth…All things are connected like the blood that unites us all.” (Al Gore, Earth in the Balance - Ecology and the Human Spirit, 1992, p. 258-259).
Gore complains that,
"...The last vestige of organized goddess worship was eliminated by Christianity." (Ibid, p. 260).
Gore continues,
"This point was made by the Catholic theologian, Teilhard de Chardin, when he said, ‘The fate of mankind, as well as of religion, depends upon the emergence of a new faith in the future.’ Armed with such a faith, we might find it possible to re-sanctify the earth." (Ibid, p. 263).
Obviously, Gore wants a religion which will meekly support his environmental extremism. Presumably it will need to be one which does not ask too many questions about his own, huge, personal 'carbon footprint' (he is one of the major users of air flight in the western world).
United Religions Initiative
The 2000 founding of the URI (United Religions Initiative), website here:
http://www.uri.org/About_URI.html, has caused a lot of controversy. This is said to be based on the UN ideal and carries the nice-sounding ideal of helping to build bridges between religions. Sounds really friendly and cosy! But the approach is theosophical - very certainly not Christian in any way. Many of the new members of this group are influenced by Buddhism and Brahmanic theories, certainly by pantheistic evolution and reincarnation. Certain pluralistic Mormons, Judaists, Islamists and Communists have committed to this effort because it fits their agenda. Oh, for sure, there is some input from liberal Christianity as well, but nothing within the new URI has any connection with biblical Christianity whatsoever. While appearing all very pleasant and friendly, groups like this are dangerous because they seek to dilute true biblical Christian doctrine in order that it should enjoy a wider appeal. These people, of course, are never true believers, they are philosophists and theosophists whose only goal is to have a happier world - they carry no understanding of a world beyond in a true biblical sense. Oh, Jesus of Nazareth is respected, but only as a great religious leader among many - nothing more.
Other Influences...
In the UK Apologetics 2008 article Coming to a Church Near You: One World Religion! we pointed out several strands of mostly (but not entirely) behind-the-scenes activity which have been going on to eventually facilitate one world religion. Here is one example:
One of the major works outlining the new 'humanist-religious' approach may be found in 'Towards a Global Ethic, An Initial Declaration,' which was written by Hans Kung, with associate Robert Muller... in 1994. This book has been described as one of the exciting and visible successes of the 'Parliament of the World's Religions' which was held in Chicago in late August of 1993. Signed by 200 "scholars and theologians representing the world's communities of faith," this document represents "a point of beginning for a world sorely in need of ethical consensus." It reaffirms a commitment to non-violence, justice and peace, and supports all persons right "to be authentically human in the spirit of our great religious, and ethical traditions."
We should point out that "to be authentically human" plus an excessive desire to be 'at one with the earth' are very typical aspirations of the mystical and often pantheistic influences behind all of these 'one world religion' moves.
The Need to Invent a "Coming World Calamity"
If a world religion is indeed coming, and the evidence is strong that many are busying themselves to make it so, one cannot say which of these several world-wide moves towards such a goal will be the most significant, very likely the most telling influences are firmly behind the scenes and we will learn little of them until the time is right. The general feeling is that the final pieces of both one world religion and one world government will not finally fall into place until the world becomes convinced of an impending calamity. The need to 'pull together' by all of humanity in the face of an emergency would probably be seen as imperative to those who would plot a world government and one world religion.
Will a non-existent 'threat to all of humanity' be invented and then aggressively encouraged? Is the plainly erroneous "climate change" fiasco (easily disproven by anybody with good access to all the relevant data) a dress rehearsal for this? Or was this the real beginning of the real and planned 'world-wide scare story' which might now have to be aborted due to too many leaks of perverted figures and statistics? This, after all, seems to be a scare story officially approved by the EU and thereafter embraced by leftist liberals in numerous countries. For sure, if the conspiracy theorists are correct, there is little question that something like "an impending threat to our planet" is going to be required for all of the pieces to fall into place. 'Climate change' has enjoyed a world-wide consensus which is striking, immediately being accepted by most educational bodies and several governments despite numerous flaws in the approach. It has displayed a surprisingly widespread willingness to cloud the true statistics and data in favour of an unproven philosophy. If this 'climate change' charade was intended to be the mega, global 'scare story' which certain people thought would lead to the pieces falling into place preparatory to introducing a world government and a world religion, it might now have to be revised. More likely, the invention of a calamity might still be just a few years away, but who knows?
Conclusion
You will read reams of information on the world wide 'net' regarding the "coming world government" and "coming world religion," probably a full 85-90% of it being in total error, so one should not believe everything one reads on this subject! Some stories and claims are preposterous and wildly exaggerated. Yet, beneath all of it, there seems to be a real truth which I have become convinced of. The concept of the plotting to form 'one world government' I am somewhat less convinced of, yet there too some pretty compelling evidence exists, however, I have no doubt at all that 'one world religion' is occupying a few hundred very able people (not true believers) on this planet at this very moment and the reality is becoming closer by the day. The truth is that even from the Liberal Protestantism of the 19th century, Christianity has been increasingly subject to influences which seek to make it a 'human' religion, mainly about the 'God within you' and such influences greatly increased during the 20th century. Existentialist theology started to write about the events of the passion of our Lord as "supra-historical," that is, as not actually occurring within human history but beyond human history; this placed the events of the crucifixion and resurrection firmly in the realm of the mystic. New Ageism has greatly expanded this influence and may now even be detected within the evangelical movement. Worship of an Immanent God is encouraged, with the concept of a Transcendent God often under fire. So-called 'Process theology' (which teaches that God has no more idea about the future than you or I) has encouraged things along the same Bible-denying path. True, biblical Christians, of course, must be determined to remain separate from any such dilution of gospel truth, holding to the true faith of our fathers, and to the Word of God. In some cases this might necessitate no longer attending a local church but only worshipping in one's own home (already a reality for numerous Christians in many countries).
Yes, liberals want nothing less than total control of your mind! They are quite prepared to attire their liberalism in any religious form as long as adherents are only worshipping at the altar of Liberalism itself.
Robin A. Brace. May 2nd, 2010.
UK APOLOGETICS
Ja toinen samasta aiheesta:
Coming to a Church Near You...
ONE WORLD RELIGION!!
Honestly, This is no Joke - In Fact, It Could Be There Already
"Revelation 11 seems to say that Christianity only receives a world-wide ban just prior to the Second Coming of our Lord (verse 13). So biblical indications seem very strong that the world-wide ban on true Christianity will mean that our Lord's return to this earth is very very close!"
Whilst this ministry has always generally avoided conspiracy theories there seems little doubt to us that moves to form one official world religion are now moving ahead briskly...
Back in 1997, an interesting event occurred in the US. One news report described it thus,
"Nearly 200 delegates wrapped up a week-long interfaith meeting at Stanford on Friday, predicting they had given birth to a movement as well as a spiritual institution: the United Religions. The 'spiritual United Nations', as some have referred to it, would be a world assembly for humanity's myriad spiritual traditions. The international 'summit conference' brought together delegates from every continent to inaugurate formal efforts to figure out the organization's structure and mission and launch a charter-writing process. After several years of talking, the initiative's planners had finally gotten down to business."
" 'You are deputized!', the Rev. William E. Swing, bishop of the Episcopal Diocese of California, told delegates as they prepared to go home. 'Tell the people that there is a United Religions, and that somewhere in the world, it is beginning to happen: that the religions are going to have an oasis where they can talk about peace.' [This conference was held June 23-27, 1997]. "
But this was certainly not the real beginning. Back in 1993/94 a 'Parliament of World Religions,' had already met in which ecumenically-oriented religious leaders agreed to redouble their efforts to define "authentic" religious belief.
Robert Muller, who has aggressively pushed forward the concepts of one world government and one world church. Amazingly, he believes that one world government and one world religion can be accomplished "within 15 years."
According to the Cephas Ministry,
"In December 1994, dozens of prominent religious leaders joined Paulos Mar Gregorius, former president of the World Council of Churches, on the banks of the river Ganges to compose the "Rishikesh Appeal," a document which urged the spiritual "empowerment" of the UN. According to the Appeal, "The UN should have a 'Spiritual Cell' with highly evolved individuals of all religions and cultures in it." These highly evolved masters would be assisted by "vast armies of spiritual adepts" who would preside over "multi-religious International Academies" in every country of the world."
Whilst UK Apologetics normally strive to avoid alarmist prophetic speculations, and this is certainly not put forward as a "prophetic fulfillment," nevertheless there seems no doubt that the so-called "World Council of Churches" (which, by the way, do not support biblical Christianity and have even provided funds for terrorist groups), has a close alliance with the United Nations in seeking an aggressive pushing forward toward a 'One World Religion' reality.
The interesting thing about the United Nations ('UN' from now on in this article), is that while many may assume their religious neutrality, many of their leading lights are supporters of New Age religious pluralism (religious pluralism: all religions lead to God). Maurice Strong, who has so aggressively pursued environmentalist policies, especially the 'Global Warning theory,' is a good example of this. On Strong, see this.
What we must immediately understand is that the proposed 'one world religion,' will not be supported by true believers of any major religion since the whole concept is to take parts of Christianity, Islam, Hinduism, Judaism and Buddhism and form one mongrel 'creed.' Such a schema, of course, will only be supported by non-theist liberals whose only intention is to further "world peace." One might well wonder what success any such initiative could possibly have when most all true theists will be left behind, but the answer is that the people who are now aggressively pursuing this agenda are only interested in religion in a politically manipulative sense! Fundamentalists are not required, indeed, several 'world religion' supporters believe that major bloodshed lies ahead as "fundamentalists" react. Pluralist-inclined religious liberals are even now being recruited to work for this cause. These include German liberal Catholic theologian Hans Kung who has often been in trouble with the Vatican for not pursuing official Roman Catholic agendas. Kung has long since been seen as a 'loose cannon' who is always on the lookout for ways to promote 'world spirituality.'
For many years, I rejected any concept that people were working behind the scenes in order to establish 'one world religion,' however, I have recently changed my view; If you look around, pretty compelling evidence is now available.
One of the major works outlining the new 'humanist-religious' approach may be found in 'Towards a Global Ethic, An Initial Declaration,' which was written by Hans Kung, with associate Robert Muller (about whom more later) in 1994. This book has been described as one of the exciting and visible successes of the 'Parliament of the World's Religions' which was held in Chicago in late August of 1993. Signed by 200 "scholars and theologians representing the world's communities of faith," this document represents "a point of beginning for a world sorely in need of ethical consensus." It reaffirms a commitment to non-violence, justice and peace, and supports all persons right "to be authentically human in the spirit of our great religious, and ethical traditions."
This so-called Global Ethic, which is fast being adopted as Inter-faithism's creed, outlines a set of basic core values to which all of the world's religions can agree. Look again at that 'Global Ethic' and note that religion is only considered in terms of people and of their preferences - there is no concept of a God who should be worshipped! People should realise that many who are now pushing forward this loathsome Christ-denying agenda are insisting that compulsory world-wide membership is the ultimate goal. This might take many years (even if it ever succeeds), but the concept is of one eventual world religion, with other religions eventually becoming banned and illegal. Right now this seems so preposterous as to almost make us laugh, however, the evidence is strong that most of the major decisions will be made behind closed doors and your average church-attending Joe and Janet Public will not get a 'look-in' - rather like the way that so many of the decisions leading to a widespread "acceptance" of abortion were taken behind closed doors; sometimes 'democracy' is a charade, please note how the British parliament has been so cynically manipulated by liberal and atheistic pro-abortion MPs in order to get the vote they want! Some of the tactics these people have used have been shameful and dishonest in the extreme. Such cynical manipulation coupled with behind-closed-doors decision-making has caused abortion to appear to have "wide support" in the western democracies when - in actual fact - the great majority of ordinary people loathe it.
Five years ago I knew a man who collected signatures in opposition to UK abortion. In one major British city he spoke to 350 people as he stood on a busy city street corner for several hours - less than 15 of these people supported abortion!! Nothing short of a liberal conspiracy forced abortion on the Christianized West! So please do not tell me that behind-the-scenes liberal conspirators would not be able to establish 'one world religion.' Of course, all the real Christians will be on the outside but that will not deter these people who will play a waiting game until the time is right to make biblical Christianity, and the other religions, illegal. Am I beginning to sound like a conspiracy theorist? I suppose I am, and that's not like me, but in this case I really believe it is going to be attempted. For many years, I rejected any concept that people were working behind the scenes in order to establish 'one world religion,' however, I have recently changed my view; If you look around, pretty compelling evidence is now available.
Robert Muller, Former Assistant Secretary General to the UN, has been on a specific and premeditated course to unite the world's religions. In his 1982 book, New Genesis: Shaping a Global Spirituality, Muller did not hide his agenda. Muller is hopeful that his vision of one religion bringing "world peace," will be the next step in human evolution - it's what he calls "Paradise Earth" but this is a humanist, God-denying 'paradise,' with a 'religion' which allows people to tap into the 'spirituality within themselves' - since most of these people do not believe in a literal Satan, they have no idea what a warm invitation they are effectively extending to him! Muller writes,
"Human history so far has been the history of a primitive race," he says. "Only now, with planet-wide knowledge and consciousness, have we entered the real challenge to our species: the good management of our earth. The real history of the world is only beginning." Muller also states,
"Within 15 years we will have a proper government and administration of planet earth and of humanity. Why? Because the current troubles, injustices, wastes and colossal duplications of national expenditures - especially on armaments and the military - will force us to. It is inevitable. The salvation of this planet and survival of the human species depend on it. No one can for long go against evolution. Nation-states must adapt or they will disintegrate, even the biggest ones."
(source:
http://goodmorningworld.org/blog/2006/01/gmw-852-robet-muller-happiest-person.html).
The irony, of course, is that Mr Muller is very likely a very decent person, however, he is one of several who have pushed the one world government and one world religion agenda for many years and it is always a liberal humanist anti-theist agenda - oh yes, religion will be there but only a state-approved one. For such people, it is very simple: they reason that if you can get rid of religious differences there will be world peace. This is really stunningly and amazingly unhistorical and naive; were Genghis Khan, Karl Marx or Adolf Hitler members of any particular religion? No, they were not! They were just seriously misguided, evil and greedy. Moreover they thought that God was not necessary - these liberal plotters think exactly the same thing! And they think that their liberal humanism can lead to world peace??!! Amazing!!
Even now, in autumn 2008, a delegation has been visiting Pope Benedict in Rome urging his acceptance of 'A Common Word' (he is unlikely to accept it at this point). This is the the new initiative to get major world religious leaders to sign up to an agreement pact. This 'Common Word' is already supported by Archbishop of Canterbury Rowan Williams (I really am not surprised by that). The full list of signatories (mostly moslem) are quoted on A Common Word's own website here. The 'A Common Word' initiative appears to be clearing the way by showing where certain religions already agree before harder discussions commence later. It may seem like a hard road ahead but even right now, according to some keen religious observers, it is as good as a 'done deal.' These people will, after all, readily accept compromise. It is already known that not all doctrines of every faith will be included; this seeks to be a broad, liberal approach only. Don't forget: this is a cynical political manipulation of religion. Many keen adherents of 'world religion' accept that there will be bloodshed before this whole thing is 'done and dusted'- they believe that fundamentalists of all faiths will cause this but that the final results will be worth it. Much more on the autumn 2008 Catholic/Moslem conference here.
This ministry has always refused to get into 'prophecy particularism,' however, it is worth noting that Revelation 11:3-13 describes a time when Christianity will finally become banned from this earth (verse 7); the 'Two Witnesses' depict Christian witnessing (the first evangelists were sent out 'two by two'). When this happens, people will be joyful (verse 10). People will come to feel that the 'world religion,' is all they need. Authentic Christian witness had made people miserable with its message of repentance, but the imposed 'one world religion' will carry no message of sin nor of repentance. But their joy will be short-lived for Christianity only receives a world-wide ban just prior to the Second Coming of our Lord (verse 13). So biblical indications seem very strong that the world-wide ban on true Christianity will mean that our Lord's return to this earth is very very close!
Yes, 'One World Religion' probably IS on the way to a church near you, but it might not get there for 10-25 years - or even much longer. BUT if you have a local highly-liberal church, it's there already!
Robin A. Brace, November 21st, 2008.
Molemmat tekstit on sivulta
http://www.ukapologetics.net
Krea jos et oo ennemmin kayny tuolla niin kannattaa kayda, paljon mielenkiintoista juttua
